Doctrine and Unity

By -



Those who know me well know I am committed to endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace (Eph 4:3). I am also committed to sound doctrine for the same reasons. I often see commitment to sound doctrine and commitment to unity in the Body presented as opposing principles, but that idea doesn’t reflect reality.

I don’t believe any believer in Christ has ever had a stronger commitment to unity in the Body than the Apostle Paul. He was obsessed with it and saw it as an elementary implication of the gospel. As a Pharisee, a Hebrew of Hebrews, his Jewishness was an integral part of his identity, perhaps the most fundamental aspect of it. Yet, it was primarily to him that the mystery of Jews and Gentiles together in one Body was revealed. He was the one sent as the Apostle to the Gentiles. It was he that publicly rebuked Peter for his implication that the Gentiles were not equal members of the Body, and it was he that championed the Gentiles’ case as fully accepted members of the Body of Christ at the Jerusalem Council (Peter at this time defended his cause).

Yet, I also doubt if anyone has ever had a fiercer commitment to sound doctrine than he did.
The truth is that false doctrine tears apart the Body of Christ (practically speaking). It causes division by turning people against each other. In the case of works salvation, or denying salvation by faith alone, it causes suspicion and judgmentalism, and even carnal oppression of others in an attempt to enforce holiness. I've seen it. I've been guilty of all of that. It is the natural outcome of legalism.

On the other hand, when we start from a place of recognizing that we were all guilty before God if based on our own merits, not just a little, but extremely so, and if not for Christ we would be utterly without hope, and if we recognize that we contribute nothing at all then we can be free to love each other, broken as we are, into the spiritual healing that is found only in a grace-filled community. I am fully accepted on His merits alone--and so are you--so there's no grounds for boasting, no grounds for condemnation or gossip. And just as I've been guilty of the judgmentalism, the implicit boasting, the division that comes with legalism, I've experienced the unconditional love of Christ expressed in a community that understands and embraces grace. A community that does that is committed to sound doctrine and is so unified that people do not hesitate to show their love for one another with their actions. This is just one example of sound doctrine promoting unity in the Body of Christ.

Sound doctrine promotes unity and sound praxis uses doctrine to build unity. The godly man who is committed to sound doctrine seeks to gently and humbly persuade those who are in opposition (2 Tim 2:24-26). Our ministry is one of reconciliation. Godly wisdom is peaceable and gentle and the one who seeks to promote righteousness does so by sewing in peace (Jas 3:17-18). And it’s the wolves who seek to divide the flock and draw some after themselves (Acts 20:29-32).

Sound doctrine is not the source of divisiveness. It can come from false doctrine (the term translated “heresy” in the New Testament means “division”) or it can come from carnality or behavior that is inconsistent with sound doctrine.

Let’s increase our commitment to sound doctrine, and as we do, let us use it as a tool in our striving to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. That’s what it means to walk worthy of our calling (Eph 4:1-3).

Popular posts from this blog

Antinomianism and Free Grace Theology

By -
By Dr. Roger Fankhauser, FGA Executive Council member and the pastor of Burleson Bible Church in Burleson, Texas.  Dr. Fankhauser can be reached at rsfankhauser at bellsouth dot net.   Antinomianism.   A fancy word meaning “lawless”.   Many who don’t get the free grace message accuse us of practicing and teaching antinomianism. They think – wrongly – that the free grace message is light on sin and light on obedience. The author of a recent best-selling book describes the message that he alleges some present this way: “We have been told all that is required is a one-time decision, maybe even mere intellectual assent to Jesus, but after that we need not worry about his commands, his standards, or his glory. We have a ticket to heaven, and we can live however we want on earth. Our sin will be tolerated along the way….” Another well-known author put it this way: “What is no-Lordship theology (the author’s name for free grace theology) but the teaching that those who died to sin can
Read more

Understanding Hebrews 10:26: Is Christ’s Sacrifice Sufficient for Me?

By -
Image
(Originally posted at thegracelings.org) Bible wasn’t given to us as a bunch of unconnected verses that all make perfect sense on their own. Sometimes, without the context, verses can sound like they mean the opposite of what the authors meant by what they wrote. It’s a terrible thing, but many times people take advantage of this fact and use isolated verses in a way that hurts people and devastates their walk with Christ. (Sometimes it’s out of ignorance. Sometimes it’s malicious. It’s always tragic.) It’s especially common for people to cite Scripture out of context in order to cause believers to doubt Christ’s love for them or the security of their salvation. This article is about one verse that is often used this way. It’s Hebrews 10:26, which reads, “For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins” (NKJV, same throughout the article). Often, people throw this verse out there on social media like a grenade wi
Read more

A Change of Mind about Repentance: Do you Dare?

By -
By Dr. Fred Lybrand   Repentance has been a sticky issue and has been around as a major conversation piece since the Reformation. I know, because ‘my view’ (which I found out I share with Dr. Elliot Johnson of Dallas Theological Seminary) has been labeled an error by those involved in the Marrow of Divinity Controversy way back in the 1600s! Of course, no need to get excited, every view on the planet and throughout history is an error to someone or some group.   So, the issue of concern here --- is repentance necessary to get saved (as in from-hell-to-heaven)? If it is necessary, then is it a part of saving faith? These are the essential questions. There are many views, often being represented as repentance meaning the necessary turning from all known sin (and interest in future sin, usually) to ‘believe’ in Christ. In this regard, some purveyors of salvation make repentance as much of a part of faith as they do works (see http://www.backtofaith.com ).   I have a bit of an uncom
Read more